Thursday, November 28, 2013

Batman and Robin


Hole of Justice

By Peter G. Jimenea           

                                             

The Amiyong and Gimena’s Story

 

If the case is illegal business, underworld characters have no recourse to proper court of law for settlement of differences. Death is the most logical solution to all judicial problems.

 

In 2007, I was hosting the Sky Cable television program “Smart Views” of then Justice Secretary (DOJ) Raul Gonzalez, Sr. when I came to know police C/Insp. Musa Amiyong. He is nice to me and we became friends.

 

He was still connected with the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) when he became the intelligence agent of DOJ Sec. Gonzalez and at the same time a bodyguard. Amiyong reports directly to Gonzalez whenever the latter is in Iloilo City.

 

Sad to note though, that in order to get his weekly intelligence fund from the DOJ secretary, sometimes, Amiyong submit raw intelligence data that I often disagree as it may nail innocent people. The other bodyguards of the secretary can attest to this fact.

On how he convinced radio-blocktimer Lito Gimena to be his sidekick in the illegal drug campaign, nobody knows. Gimena, however, indirectly confirmed it through his pompous display of gun tucked on his waist. This earned them the tag Batman and Robin.

 

As womanizing is the name of their game, Batman and Robin were forced to get out of the way to make money to support this vice. But Robin is not a Muslim, his womanizing cannot be tolerated by his wife, an OFW who finally split from him.

 

Soon lot of reports were heard about the illegal operation of Batman and Robin. One modus is the planting of grenade in business establishments for the explosive-expert police officer who is their cohort to detonate for a reward. A mall in the city is one of their victims.

 

There were also report of unlawful arrest and confiscation of illegal drugs committed by Batman and Robin in Bacolod and in other adjacent cities of Negros Occidental. This tells about the anger of a drug lord in the city of smile against the two for the mess they’re in. The PDEA is not innocent about this case.

 

But worse of all is their planting of three hand grenades tied on a string under the reserved cottage for a regular customer of Tatoy’s Manokan in  Villa Beach, Arevalo. It was reserved for the family of a businessman, his wife, children and grand-children for a weekend celebration.

 

Luckily, it was noticed by a passer-by walking near the cottage and immediately reported it. The would-be victim and family escaped death. Managuit, the police explosive expert arrived and released the three hand grenades as if loosening only the string of his shoes.

 

But one time where there is no monetary reward involved, a reported hand grenade on a roof top of a residential house in Baluarte, Molo was recovered. Managuit tried to detonate the hand grenade in his office fronting the Robinsons mall when it suddenly exploded killing him on the spot.

 

Batman and Robin don’t have the faintest idea that the night before, they were seen by a waiter who knew them personally doing something under that cottage of Tatoy’s Manokan. They were both identified. But as they were already dead this issue is now water under the bridge. May they rest in peace.

 

Robin was killed in E.B. Magalona, Negros Occidental by two assassins riding in tandem on a motorcycle on Aug. 22, 2011. Batman was also shot by two motorcycle-riding assailants at Quirino Bridge in Iloilo City on November 22, 2013. He died in the early morning of Nov. 28, six days after he was shot.

 

According to some street smarts the two got only what they really deserved. But for the businessman and members of his family who escaped death, they are still unforgiven, that even if Batman and Robin rise from the dead, as to contrition for what they did - apology not accepted!

Monday, November 11, 2013

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea Cancer of Society History reveals that Illegal drugs had destroyed many law enforcers in go...

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea Cancer of Society History reveals that Illegal drugs had destroyed many law enforcers in go...

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society

Hole of Justice: Cancer of Society: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea Cancer of Society History reveals that Illegal drugs had destroyed many law enforcers in go...

Cancer of Society


Hole of Justice

by Peter G. Jimenea

Cancer of Society

History reveals that Illegal drugs had destroyed many law enforcers in government service. Gen. Dictador Alqueza was a National Director of the Narcotics Command (NARCOM) for only a week when relieved by Pres. Joseph Estrada after his name was linked to illegal drugs.

Gen. Roberto Lastimoso was also sacked as PNP Director General after he intervenes for the release of seven Chinese nationals apprehended in a raid at Sariaya, Quezon with sacks of shabu loaded in two waiting private vans.

P/Supt. John Campos, a former narcotic agent was shot dead while on his way home by unknown assailants. His girlfriend “Rose Bud” likewise a police “asset” at the narcotics command claimed his death is linked to drugs.

There are more unreported big drug-related cases but treated with cold-shoulder by authorities In fact, when I started writing in 1994, nobody inquires as they knew nothing about it. Now they do, after the problem becomes a serious crisis.

Illegal drugs proliferate due to corruptibility of our public officials. Drug money can buy politicians, judges, prosecutors, law enforcers, court personnel, television and movie personalities, journalists, government workers and underworld characters.

Even law enforcers are fighting each other as if fighting criminals on the street because of drug money. And as long as the predominant poor of this country are confined in poverty for lack of employment, no police or military action can stop the proliferation of illegal drugs.

The evidence is right here on our very nose. If the head of a family is a drug-pusher and gets arrested, the wife takes his place. If the wife is caught and jailed, the children will soon follow their footsteps. Why? They need to eat and a hungry stomach knows no law.

But if there are enough jobs for the poor families, what's more to risk the future of their kids? If they have a home, decent clothing, regular meals a day, appliances, health insurance and educational plan, do you think they can be waylaid?

I consider employment the most logical solution to drug problem. If illegal drugs are virus, the drug lords, drug trafficker and drug dealers are cancer of society. They are hard to nail because there are no illegal drugs, not even a grain of the stuff inside their homes.

They transfigure cancer living in one’s body but dependent on the food to grow. Here, drug traders are cancer of society who depends solely on drug pushers to survive and enjoy life’s best. But who says cancer is incurable?

My interview with different doctor/specialists helped me understand that cancer would only grow if fed. It needs food and the substance it gets from unhealthy food determines the speed of growth. But doctors say, starved cancer and it will die a natural death.

If only the government can propagate industrialization by putting up plants for manufacturing and production of say micro-chip, canned goods, quality fibers, and many more rather than to give more favor on commercialization, this will start the real war against illegal drugs.

If there are more jobs, there will be less number of drug pushers on the streets. Once the profit drops and cannot suffice to support the vices of drug lords, this will force them to risk their personal security in selling the stuff. But for how long, your guess is as good as mine!

Monday, October 28, 2013

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                           A Badmouth Radio Commentator   Jurisprudence dictates: “Pre...

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                           A Badmouth Radio Commentator   Jurisprudence dictates: “Pre...

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                           A Badmouth Radio Commentator   Jurisprudence dictates: “Pre...

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                           A Badmouth Radio Commentator   Jurisprudence dictates: “Pre...

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator

Hole of Justice: Irresponsible Radio Commentator: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                           A Badmouth Radio Commentator   Jurisprudence dictates: “Pre...

Irresponsible Radio Commentator


Hole of Justice

By Peter G. Jimenea                       

 

A Badmouth Radio Commentator

 

Jurisprudence dictates: “Press freedom is enshrined in the Constitution but such freedom should not be abused because in every right there is a concomitant obligation.” (G.R. No. 157315, Dec. 1, 2010). This is the language of law.

 

Court stands firmly by things that have been decided on cases with similar facts and had been resolved in the past. It warns too; Suum jus, summa injuria – the abuse of right is the greatest possible wrong. (Arlegui vs CA, 378 SCRA 322).

 

But I am surprised on why radio broadcaster Jun Alojado Capulot of DYOK has been putting me down in his program by insinuating that I have a link with a certain Dragon, he alleged a drug lord.

 

Probably, he is referring to a businessman-owner of a transportation company who is one of advertisers in my television program “Kape kag Isyu.” Capulot has deliberately put malice to my business relation with this man he fondly called Dragon.

 

Does it put substance to his insinuation that when a person he suspects as vice lord placed a paid advertisement of his legal business in my program, do I am already engaged in illegal activities? It is an honest source of income. If he can cite to me any politician whom I have asked a centavo, I will resign as a media practitioner!

 

Capulot seems in run amuck. I am not alone in his unfounded accusation on the air. He also lambasted PRO6 Dir. Agrimero Cruz, ICPO Dir. S/Supt. R. Floro, the PDEA, Iloilo City Mayor Jed Patrick Mabiiog and some innocent people including me his colleague in the media industry.

 

 

The public should know as this is not what we think a radio commentator’s business is all about.  What’s more, the one thing we all abhor is not a cheap shot but illegal drugs. Yet, Capulot’s handling of the issue is out of pique and inflating out of proportion. Irresponsible!

 

Why insinuate only? He should have investigated further to obtain the proper evidence that can pin down the culprits in his dreams. A continue insinuations can besmirch the reputation of innocent people. Get out of your hole and help the authorities rather than wage a war against them.

 

Look, he derides members of the PNP, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA6) and the city mayor for not running after the man and the others whom he wanted to pin down by insinuations. Capulot’s concept of justice is at odds with due process.    

 

He wants to become a hero at the expense of the PDEA and other PNP anti-Illegal drug units in the city. His desire is easy said than done. But where is the evidence for the law enforcers to follow his wish? If people commit crime, the authorities need not be told by this radio commentator to arrest them.

 

Thus, for his temerity to attack anybody at whims, he was forced to lock himself like a prisoner in a certain quarter at radio station DYOK for fear of his life from the dozen or more enemies he created and now his feared would-be assassins. In this case, who made his life miserable?

 

Oddly enough, while attacking Dragon for two months, he spared the Barangay Bakhaw in Mandurriao, which police record speaks, has more number of drug pushers apprehended and more volume of illegal drugs confiscated compared to all the other city barangays.

 

A report from PDEA tells there are 127 city barangays affected by illegal drugs. But Capulot attacked only Dragon and at times, insulted me. What is there in Barangay Bakhaw anyway, that he spared it when war against illegal drugs is a cause as he earlier claimed at?

 

Capulot’s over-kill insinuation lacks the substance to deserve public attention. The more he talks about people he wants to link to Dragon without evidence to support, the more he isolates himself from DYOK’s listeners.

 

This only reinforced the widespread public belief that he is an irresponsible media practitioner. Jurisprudence dictates; “he who has lied about one thing is most likely to lie about everything.” (Ramos vs. CA, 188 SCRA 450). With a liar radio commentator on the loose, isn’t this a cause for alarm?

 

The temerity to put in bad light the integrity of innocent people without the benefit of evidence is something he had already paid a dear price in the past. His victim, a lady doctor, had taught him a lesson for his large propensity to badmouthing. Reminder: “a probation” is only enjoyed by a convict once in a lifetime.

 

Capulot doesn’t learn. He probably believes that hard-hitting commentators convicted or jailed for libel cases are the best media practitioners. Not today, conviction for libel is a proof of irresponsible journalism. I’m not sure though, if John Paul Tia DYOK’s station manager subscribes to this.

 

There is no intent to offend but you dragged my name several times insinuating a bad link between me and my advertiser. Is it jealousy? He is a friend, so what’s wrong about it? You’ve gone too far Jun Alojado Capulot. A friendly advice, stop talking lies about me and I’ll stop telling the truth about you!

 

 

Irresponsible Commentator


Hole of Justice

By Peter G. Jimenea                       

 

A Badmouth Radio Commentator

 

Jurisprudence dictates: “Press freedom is enshrined in the Constitution but such freedom should not be abused because in every right there is a concomitant obligation.” (G.R. No. 157315, Dec. 1, 2010). This is the language of law.

 

Court stands firmly by things that have been decided on cases with similar facts and had been resolved in the past. It warns too; Suum jus, summa injuria – the abuse of right is the greatest possible wrong. (Arlegui vs CA, 378 SCRA 322).

 

But I am surprised on why radio broadcaster Jun Alojado Capulot of DYOK has been putting me down in his program by insinuating that I have a link with a certain Dragon, he alleged a drug lord.

 

Probably, he is referring to a businessman-owner of a transportation company who is one of advertisers in my television program “Kape kag Isyu.” Capulot has deliberately put malice to my business relation with this man he fondly called Dragon.

 

Does it put substance to his insinuation that when a person he suspects as vice lord placed a paid advertisement of his legal business in my program, do I am already engaged in illegal activities? It is an honest source of income. If he can cite to me any politician whom I have asked a centavo, I will resign as a media practitioner!

 

Capulot seems in run amuck. I am not alone in his unfounded accusation on the air. He also lambasted PRO6 Dir. Agrimero Cruz, ICPO Dir. S/Supt. R. Floro, the PDEA, Iloilo City Mayor Jed Patrick Mabiiog and some innocent people including me his colleague in the media industry.

 

 

The public should know as this is not what we think a radio commentator’s business is all about.  What’s more, the one thing we all abhor is not a cheap shot but illegal drugs. Yet, Capulot’s handling of the issue is out of pique and inflating out of proportion. Irresponsible!

 

Why insinuate only? He should have investigated further to obtain the proper evidence that can pin down the culprits in his dreams. A continue insinuations can besmirch the reputation of innocent people. Get out of your hole and help the authorities rather than wage a war against them.

 

Look, he derides members of the PNP, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA6) and the city mayor for not running after the man and the others whom he wanted to pin down by insinuations. Capulot’s concept of justice is at odds with due process.    

 

He wants to become a hero at the expense of the PDEA and other PNP anti-Illegal drug units in the city. His desire is easy said than done. But where is the evidence for the law enforcers to follow his wish? If people commit crime, the authorities need not be told by this radio commentator to arrest them.

 

Thus, for his temerity to attack anybody at whims, he was forced to lock himself like a prisoner in a certain quarter at radio station DYOK for fear of his life from the dozen or more enemies he created and now his feared would-be assassins. In this case, who made his life miserable?

 

Oddly enough, while attacking Dragon for two months, he spared the Barangay Bakhaw in Mandurriao, which police record speaks, has more number of drug pushers apprehended and more volume of illegal drugs confiscated compared to all the other city barangays.

 

A report from PDEA tells there are 127 city barangays affected by illegal drugs. But Capulot attacked only Dragon and at times, insulted me. What is there in Barangay Bakhaw anyway, that he spared it when war against illegal drugs is a cause as he earlier claimed at?

 

Capulot’s over-kill insinuation lacks the substance to deserve public attention. The more he talks about people he wants to link to Dragon without evidence to support, the more he isolates himself from DYOK’s listeners.

 

This only reinforced the widespread public belief that he is an irresponsible media practitioner. Jurisprudence dictates; “he who has lied about one thing is most likely to lie about everything.” (Ramos vs. CA, 188 SCRA 450). With a liar radio commentator on the loose, isn’t this a cause for alarm?

 

The temerity to put in bad light the integrity of innocent people without the benefit of evidence is something he had already paid a dear price in the past. His victim, a lady doctor, had taught him a lesson for his large propensity to badmouthing. Reminder: “a probation” is only enjoyed by a convict once in a lifetime.

 

Capulot doesn’t learn. He probably believes that hard-hitting commentators convicted or jailed for libel cases are the best media practitioners. Not today, conviction for libel is a proof of irresponsible journalism. I’m not sure though, if John Paul Tia DYOK’s station manager subscribes to this.

 

There is no intent to offend but you dragged my name several times insinuating a bad link between me and my advertiser. Is it jealousy? He is a friend, so what’s wrong about it? You’ve gone too far Jun Alojado Capulot. A friendly advice, stop talking lies about me and I’ll stop telling the truth about you!

 

 

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                                                       Sensational Lovers’ Case   In 1...

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                                                       Sensational Lovers’ Case   In 1...

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                                                       Sensational Lovers’ Case   In 1...

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                                                       Sensational Lovers’ Case   In 1...

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case

Hole of Justice: Sensational Lovers' Case: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea                                                       Sensational Lovers’ Case   In 1...

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Sensational Lovers' Case


Hole of Justice

By Peter G. Jimenea           

                                         

Sensational Lovers’ Case

 

In 1981, Mrs Billie Jean King, the six-times Wimbledon Single Tennis Champion and President of the Women’s Tennis Ass’n. (WTA), was accused by Marilyn Barnett, her former personal secretary for breach of oral contract. The latter claimed they are lovers but was forced to file the case when King demanded that she vacates the Malibu beach home owned by the tennis star.

 

Barnett testified that the house was promised to her by Mrs King through a verbal agreement when they are still in the intimacy of a relationship. Unknown to Barnett, King had earlier filed an eviction case against her because despite the offer of money for her to leave the Malibu house, she rejected the offer and refused to leave.

 

The sensational case was feasted by the press. But days after the news broke out, King called for a press conference. She was accompanied by her husband Larry King, a sports promoter. At the press conference King admitted that she and Barnett had been lovers when she was still active in the sport.

 

She claimed to have told her husband about the affair when she noticed that Barnett wants to get more money from her.  She also noticed that Barnett doesn’t want to give up the beach house despite the offer of monetary consideration to start her new life when she vacates the place. Barnett declined the offer and stood pat on her claim to the property.

 

Barnett 33, had filed a 13 page suit seeking a lifetime support and title to the Malibu beach house which she said Mrs King had promised her. She abandoned her hairdressing career to be the secretary of Mrs King from 1972 to 1979, while enjoying the sexual intimacy on a regular basis. But now King demanded that she moves out from the Malibu house so it can be sold.

 

Months before the suit was filed, however, Barnett had fallen from a balcony of a building and become a paraplegic. During the press conference, King denied their relationship saying that she was shocked by the action of her secretary. But against the advice of her lawyer, she admitted; “I did have an affair with Marilyn Barnett.”

 

Her mom and husband were there to give her full support when she addressed the journalist; “I’ve always been honest. I’ve decided to talk with you as I’ve always talked from my heart. I am very disappointed and shocked that Marilyn has done this, not only to herself a very destructive thing, but to other people who cared for her.”

 

King added; “Though the affair had been over for some time, I made a mistake. I will assume that responsibility. I discussed it with Larry – in some ways I think we’re much closer today than we’ve ever been and our marriage is stronger.” King tendered her resignation as president of WTA but was rejected by WTA authorities and public response was overwhelmingly favourable to her as shown by sacks of letters coming in.

 

The niceties of the Court trial came in two parts. The first suit heard in December 1981, was filed by Mrs King and husband to force Barnett to leave the beach house. The former hairdresser entered the Los Angeles Superior Court with stick and long grey skirt to hide her leg braces. In the witness stand she was asked by Mrs King’s counsel what she had done for the tennis star.

 

Barnett answered; “I gave up my career, my identity, my pride and my home.” She admitted hoping for a life-long relationship with King. When asked if the tennis star owed her something, she said; “yes.” The Court, however, decided in favour of King and husband. They won the right to evict Barnett from the disputed beach house.

 

The judge ruled that Barnett had come close to trying to extort money from the tennis star; it appeared that Billie Jean King and husband had offered her $125,000 to get her to leave the house. Ms Barnett had refused, according to the judge, because she felt she can get more money. In November 1982, the judge dismissed all Barnett’s claims and her plea for “Palimony” has failed. True, res clamat domino- a thing insists for its owner!