Sunday, October 27, 2013

Sensational Lovers' Case


Hole of Justice

By Peter G. Jimenea           

                                         

Sensational Lovers’ Case

 

In 1981, Mrs Billie Jean King, the six-times Wimbledon Single Tennis Champion and President of the Women’s Tennis Ass’n. (WTA), was accused by Marilyn Barnett, her former personal secretary for breach of oral contract. The latter claimed they are lovers but was forced to file the case when King demanded that she vacates the Malibu beach home owned by the tennis star.

 

Barnett testified that the house was promised to her by Mrs King through a verbal agreement when they are still in the intimacy of a relationship. Unknown to Barnett, King had earlier filed an eviction case against her because despite the offer of money for her to leave the Malibu house, she rejected the offer and refused to leave.

 

The sensational case was feasted by the press. But days after the news broke out, King called for a press conference. She was accompanied by her husband Larry King, a sports promoter. At the press conference King admitted that she and Barnett had been lovers when she was still active in the sport.

 

She claimed to have told her husband about the affair when she noticed that Barnett wants to get more money from her.  She also noticed that Barnett doesn’t want to give up the beach house despite the offer of monetary consideration to start her new life when she vacates the place. Barnett declined the offer and stood pat on her claim to the property.

 

Barnett 33, had filed a 13 page suit seeking a lifetime support and title to the Malibu beach house which she said Mrs King had promised her. She abandoned her hairdressing career to be the secretary of Mrs King from 1972 to 1979, while enjoying the sexual intimacy on a regular basis. But now King demanded that she moves out from the Malibu house so it can be sold.

 

Months before the suit was filed, however, Barnett had fallen from a balcony of a building and become a paraplegic. During the press conference, King denied their relationship saying that she was shocked by the action of her secretary. But against the advice of her lawyer, she admitted; “I did have an affair with Marilyn Barnett.”

 

Her mom and husband were there to give her full support when she addressed the journalist; “I’ve always been honest. I’ve decided to talk with you as I’ve always talked from my heart. I am very disappointed and shocked that Marilyn has done this, not only to herself a very destructive thing, but to other people who cared for her.”

 

King added; “Though the affair had been over for some time, I made a mistake. I will assume that responsibility. I discussed it with Larry – in some ways I think we’re much closer today than we’ve ever been and our marriage is stronger.” King tendered her resignation as president of WTA but was rejected by WTA authorities and public response was overwhelmingly favourable to her as shown by sacks of letters coming in.

 

The niceties of the Court trial came in two parts. The first suit heard in December 1981, was filed by Mrs King and husband to force Barnett to leave the beach house. The former hairdresser entered the Los Angeles Superior Court with stick and long grey skirt to hide her leg braces. In the witness stand she was asked by Mrs King’s counsel what she had done for the tennis star.

 

Barnett answered; “I gave up my career, my identity, my pride and my home.” She admitted hoping for a life-long relationship with King. When asked if the tennis star owed her something, she said; “yes.” The Court, however, decided in favour of King and husband. They won the right to evict Barnett from the disputed beach house.

 

The judge ruled that Barnett had come close to trying to extort money from the tennis star; it appeared that Billie Jean King and husband had offered her $125,000 to get her to leave the house. Ms Barnett had refused, according to the judge, because she felt she can get more money. In November 1982, the judge dismissed all Barnett’s claims and her plea for “Palimony” has failed. True, res clamat domino- a thing insists for its owner!

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment